She is a lovely girl having nice back. I think when the lady ordered her to remove her trouser and panties and warned that she would be caned she definitely knew that she would get cane on her bare bottom. This type of caning, as I have learnt, was available in early Russia -- but mostly for boys. Naughty boys were ordered by father or elder relative like uncle or grandfather to remove his pants and lay down on a bench. Then canings were made on bare bottom. It was very painful. In my country, Sri Lanka, such bare bottom canings were available in early period -- also for boys. In schools we, boys had canings on our short-clad bottoms. They are painful. We were afraid to have canings on bottom.
Here it is little bit of strange that the girl does not raise any objection or at least an appeal against lady's orders to remove her all cloths below the waist even in front of a male person. She may be intimidated by her offence. Kelly was having a nice watch on her nice big bottom. Even when Kelly comes down to the place as requested by the lady, the girl does not try to cover her private parts and bottom. While caning Kelly several times touches her bottom. Only after several such touches she raise some objection, which was strongly dismissed by the lady. I think the punishment is too much. After hard caning she should have been allowed to leave. But the lady ordered her to stay there whole afternoon with her waist down fully naked.
And also those day, we in primary classes in most cases up to grade 7 or 8, did not wear underpants, only shorts. So, having bottom caning was so painful. Cane marks on our bottom cheeks could be visible for a week or more. In most cases master also land few strokes below our shorts giving much pain. We used to try to cover our bottom with our hands. Then what happened: Some cane strokes hit our hands giving much pains.
Watching this I can remember my and my friends' own experience in caning by masters during our school days. I went to three mixed schools. Then caning was common. But bottom caning was given only for boys. Girls were given only palm caning. In my primary education I attended a rural school. It was not a big school. It has only one long hall. All grades were in that hall. The principal's office was on the stage at one end of the hall. So, he can watch hall school from his office. When a boy did some mischief most class teachers used to send him to principals office with a note. The teacher and also others in the class can watch what would happened to boy at principals office. Then I was in grade one. Then normally our class teacher did not send us to principals office although she warned to so, We have seen several caning scenes. One incident. Our class teachers paid it to our attention. A boy from grade six approached principals office. He handed over the note from teacher. The principal was seen reading it. Then he made an order. We saw how boy walked to the wall and leaned against it with hand up and touching the wall turning his backside out. The principal brought a thin cane. He tapped boys short-clad bottom with the cane and switched it away and delivered a hard stroke on poor boy's bottom. Boy screamed and began to rub his bottom vigorously. The principal ordered him to keep his hand away from his bottom and delivered five more strokes. The boy was crying and jumping up and down. Our class teacher warned us if we misbehave she would send us to principal like that. We are trembling seeing that.
One of my favorite video. I watch this much frequently. This girl is somewhat naughty. What he did -- throwing a fruit to hit Kelly -- is wrong. Anyway she did it without understanding its consequences. She got her punishment. She would never forget. We also never forget such harsh caning we had during our school days. When seeing this girl having harsh caning on her bare bottom we also feel something on our bottom. We still can remember sever paining.